Fireflies.ai
from $10/mo
AI notetaker and searchable meeting knowledge base for teams.
Visit Fireflies.aiA side-by-side of Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai on pricing and our methodology scores, drawn from each tool's category Listings. They compete in Best AI Meeting Notes.
from $10/mo
AI notetaker and searchable meeting knowledge base for teams.
Visit Fireflies.aifrom $17/mo
Real-time transcription and AI meeting notes, built for live capture.
Visit Otter.aiThe verdict
Otter.ai is the stronger overall pick. In the Best AI Meeting Notes ranking it scores 3.45 to Fireflies.ai's 3.38 out of 5. That said, Fireflies.ai wins on individual criteria below, so read the breakdown against your own priorities.
| Fireflies.ai | Otter.ai | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $10/mo | $17/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Best AI Meeting Notes score | 3.38 (#4) | 3.45 (#3) |
Reviewers and independent testers cite roughly 90–95% accuracy on clear audio, but the most repeated complaint is that accuracy slips badly with heavy accents, background noise, and people talking over each other.
Hits up to ~93–95% on clean recordings, but real-world accuracy drops toward 85% with background noise, overlapping speakers, and strong accents, and multi-person calls suffer from speaker mislabeling.
Summaries with timestamps and action items get praised as productivity wins, but independent reviewers flag inconsistency — recaps can flatten nuanced conversations and action-item attribution is unreliable, sometimes naming the wrong owner or inventing tasks.
The jump-from-bullet-to-transcript feature is genuinely useful, but reviewers report summaries that miss the real next steps and read as disorganized or generalized, leaving teams to review meetings manually.
The clearest strength here — Fireflies shows up across every major meeting platform and pushes notes into CRMs cleanly enough to save reviewers 10–15 minutes of data entry per call, though native CRM depth is shallow and Slack Huddles and Webex coverage is incomplete.
The core meeting stack — Zoom, Teams, Meet — connects seamlessly on every plan, but the wider app catalog is described as limited and CRM connectors are gated above the free tier.
Certifications are solid (SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA) and data is encrypted in transit and at rest, but all audio uploads to the cloud, the privacy policy permits marketing use and third-party sharing, and a December 2025 class-action lawsuit alleges biometric data collection without consent — an allegation, not a ruling, but a real gap between certified and private for regulated teams.
Independent reviewers confirm AES-256 encryption, available two-factor auth, and a general sense that transcripts stay confidential, backed by SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA on the vendor side.
Independent reviewers call the $10 Pro tier reasonably priced and competitive, but value is the single most contested theme on review sites — around 40% of negative reviews cite high cost and confusing billing, and some find paid tiers expensive next to rival transcription tools.
Annual pricing around $100/year is a fair accuracy-to-price balance, but reviewers find it pricey unless heavily used, and the free tier's 300-minute cap frustrates heavier users fast.
StackAmplify may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page. This does not influence the scores, which are computed from each category's published methodology.